The Vanishing. Thursday, March 27th

Original Title: Spoorloos

Color / French, Dutch and English Languages / English Subtitles / MPA rating: Not rated / Runtime: 107 min

The central situation of The Vanishing is a mystery archetype: a couple is on holiday in a foreign country when one disappears, and the other searches for the missing person. Witnesses claim to have seen nothing unusual, and authorities question even the existence of the absent partner. Rooted in the uneasiness we all feel when we’re off our home turf, this familiar nightmare is embodied in an urban legend about the Paris exposition of 1901, which inspired the novel filmed by Alfred Hitchcock as The Lady Vanishes (1938). Explicitly dramatized in Terence Fisher’s So Long at the Fair (1950), the central idea has also been examined in films as varied as Robert Fuest’s And Soon the Darkness (1970), Philip Leacock’s Dying Room Only (1973), and Roman Polanski’s Frantic (1988).

Usually, these plots offer sustained suspense but quickly deliver a solution that finds the couple reunited and the villains exposed. Indeed, Dutch director George Sluizer and writer Tim Krabbé, adapting Krabbé’s novel The Golden Egg, open The Vanishing—a Dutch-French co-production with the Hitchcockian French title of L’Homme qui voulait savoir (The Man Who Wanted to Know)—as if the “lady vanishes” rerun will be all their story has to offer. But they soon take a very unusual approach to their central mystery, which is explored from several angles. We follow Dutch couple Rex (Gene Bervoets) and Saskia (Johanna ter Steege) as they enter France for a cycling holiday, bickering in a manner that establishes how impulsive Saskia is, making it credible that she might just up and leave Rex at any moment. But we also track Raymond Lermorne (Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu), the middle-class psychotic behind the vanishing, as he sets up his abduction. Having revealed the identity of the kidnapper—thus daringly defusing the most obvious point of suspense—the film then goes even further, and gives the audience intimate access to his life.

Saskia sets out to buy some cold drinks at a service station and never comes back. Sluizer shows the bustling, impersonal, sunstruck, middle-of-nowhere European location as a sinister, uncaring limbo where everyone is too intent on the radio commentary on the Tour de France to pay attention to a crazy foreigner whose girlfriend has left him. In an audacious and jarring move, the film then skips three years during which no leads have borne fruit and Saskia has not turned up dead or alive. We pick up Rex with Lieneke (Gwen Eckhaus), his new girlfriend, and discover how an obsession with learning what happened to Saskia is poisoning his whole life. Rex chillingly admits that, given the choice between knowing the details of Saskia’s death or remaining oblivious to her survival, he would prefer the first option. An astonishing moment, it adds a darker shade to the traditional figure of the concerned hero who will never give up on a mystery. Rex’s revelation also indicts the audience’s culpability—after all, we too want above all to learn the answer, even if it is truly appalling.

The Vanishing is a study in everyday madness, rooted in the specifics of the Dutch and French landscapes and character (the bearded, jolly Raymond is every inch the French bourgeois, a wistful psychotic imp of the perverse), with acute performances from its four leads. There’s an obvious contrast between Bervoets and Donnadieu, with the hero seeming more driven and obsessive than the deceptively-calm villain, echoed in the mirroring of the flaky, captivating, maddening ter Steege with the calm, down-to-earth, long-suffering Eckhaus. Though Donnadieu has played supporting roles in French films, from Le retour de Martin Guerre (1982) to Max, mon amour (1986), and ter Steege followed The Vanishing with strong English-language roles in Robert Altman’s Vincent and Theo (1990) and István Szabó’s Meeting Venus (1991), this is a film that gains strength from the relative unfamiliarity of its cast, making it hard for an audience to fix on a degree of sympathy with or fear of the characters.

George Sluizer had worked in the cinema since 1958, beginning as an assistant to documentarian Bert Haanstra. After his first film as director, De Lage landen (Hold Back the Sea, 1960), a documentary about land reclamation, he spent ten years on similar projects before making his fiction debut with the Brazilian-shot Joâo (1972). He continued to alternate between fiction and documentary before making an “experimental” American picture, Red Desert Penitentiary (1985). Although The Vanishing alone made his name as an international director, its methodical deliberation and ruthless spurning of convention can be seen as a culmination of Sluizer’s previous work.

Still, he has had a hard time reprising its success—literally so in the case of The Vanishing (1993), a Hollywoodized remake scripted by Todd Graff (Coyote Ugly, 2000) with an upbeat ending as “wrong” as the one imposed by Jeremiah Chechik on the 1996 remake of Diabolique. Unlike Hitchcock, whose American The Man Who Knew Too Much (1955) is at once a remake and a development of his 1934 British film of the same title, Sluizer struggled when presented with the material a second time around. Talented players Kiefer Sutherland, Jeff Bridges, Nancy Travis, and Sandra Bullock fail to match the icy understatement of the original cast.

It may be that The Vanishing is a one-off: a film so original, so effective, so surprising and so ruthless that it represents a single, perfect coming-together of director, writer, subject, and cast. It delivers a shattering twist ending, but has a depth and lasting creepiness that makes it repay repeat viewings. Hitchcock always argued for suspense over surprise, but The Vanishing delivers both: the first time you see it, the mystery is intriguing and the solution horrible; the second time, when you know what’s coming, it takes on a more tragic, even more horrifying dimension.

Kim Newman, for The Criterion Collection

Small Things Like These. It’s never too late to make amends.

It’s just not right, that.

Bill (Cillian Murphey), haunted by his childhood suffering, can no longer turn a blind eye to injustices around him, and takes action that will no doubt cause a lot of trouble down the line. The movie ends here, and we are left to imaging the consequences of his action. There will be no sequel.

Not just a moving story, Small Things Like These is a feast for the eyes and ears. Absolutely stunning. We had a small, happy audience tonight.

Good One? Great One!

No Dad, we can’t just “have a nice day”.

I first saw Good One on Christmas day, 2024. Of course, I loved it, but I thought at the time that it was maybe a bit slow and quiet for NewScreen. Nonetheless, it left an indelible mark in my memory, and when I dug it out of the proverbial crates last week, I thought “Fuck it. I hope they’ll like it…” Guess what? They didn’t like it… they loved it. I had kinda forgotten how funny it was, as well.

Thanks to Tineke and Zoe for bringing new people to NewScreen. It makes me happy to make people happy with NewScreen!

Companion. AI as heroine.

Boom.

Thanks to my loyal audience for trusting me and coming out to see this. They were certainly not disappointed! Companion rocks and so does Sophie Thatcher. I’m somewhat embarrassed, but I do have to acknowledge that a nepo Quaid (assuming that the Trumper gene lives on in this fucked up family) also delivered a great performance.

A great NewScreen, once again. Happy me.

Nosferatu. Come to me.

Why put them in water? They’ll just be dead in a few days.

For some reason, this gorgeous movie didn’t connect with my guests tonight as much as it did for me… one even described it as mediocre the next day. Although I was able to talk her out of that description, and suggest that she watch it again, I doubt she will, and even if she does, it won’t be the same as it was on our beautiful screen with kick-ass sound.

Oh well.

Compartment No. 6. Screening No. 2.

People who don’t want to watch a great movie again because “I’ve already seen it”? I don’t get it. Is this the way of the world now? Maybe so. I’ll try to remember to deny seeing Casablanca 20+ times when I get pulled up in front of a DOGE inquiry into my movie watching efficiency.

Grumbling aside… thanks to you devotees who came out on St. Valentine’s Eve. to see this gorgeous rom-com. I wanted to remind people that they’ve enjoyed this introduction to Yura Borisov here before his brilliant star turn as Igor in Anora.

The Girl with the Needle sews us to the screen tonight.

Well, this will be a hard act to follow. Magnus Von Horn is certainly a director to keep both eyes on, and for a little over 2 hours, that’s exactly what our house did. Dark and Danish (new cocktail?). Vic Carmen Sonne’s performance was remarkable, as was the cinematography. Gorgeous. And that rug-pull moment… yikes.

I mistakenly stated that MVH had only made two features (this and Sweat), but he has, in fact, made three. His first, The Here After also won high praise. Each of his movies is in a different language, as well.

Great to welcome new people to NewScreen tonight, along with one from waaaay back! Fun.

Sweat. NewScreen works out.

I happened upon this hidden gem while in pursuit of director Magnus Von Horn’s 2024 feature, The Girl with the Needle. At first glance, Von Horn’s two movies are quite different… one is set in the modern world of social media influencing, the other, in the dark days immediately following the end of the first world war. The common thread? Each tells a story from the perspective of a young woman, struggling to survive in difficult circumstances.

After taking a week off to recover from a surgery, I was really happy to be back, and was gratified by the healthy turnup! More Von Horn next week?

Bird. NewScreen soars on a Wednesday night.

Dad! Why are you in such a good mood?

As Ryan Lattanzio summarized in his IndieWire revew: Bird is not Arnold’s best film — how can you top the cross-country raptures of “American Honey” or the final synchronized dance to Nas in “Fish Tank”? But it’s certainly her most ambitious in terms of willingness to stretch her creative reach beyond the social-realist-only confines of some of her early work.

That’s a good way of looking at it. Andrea Arnold’s empathetic observation of youth, particularly those in hardscrabble circumstances, has always been spot-on, in much the same way as that of the Dardenne brothers, but with a very British flavor. Barry Keoghan, and newcomer, Nykiya Adams shone, as did Franz Rogowski, as Bird. Rogowski is a German actor who was born with a cleft lip. His cleft was surgically closed, resulting in a slight lisp. He first appeared on our screen (well, it was the previous screen, at MovieNight, in Sebastian Schipper’s Victoria… maybe time for another look?). His career has gone from strength to strength.

Since I had a surgery scheduled for 6am on Friday morning, it seemed sensible to move NewScreen to Wednesday this week. We had an unexpectedly great turnout tonight. Thanks everyone! See you next time.

Sunrise. A Song of Two Humans. Woman of the City = Bad. Peasant Girl = Good.

It was great to be able to show this ancient gem to people who hadn’t seen it. Apparently Sunrise flopped at the time of its release, due to the rising popularity of “talkies”. I wonder if any of those could possibly be as memorable. Another interesting fact: the studio insisted on a happy ending, which Murnau was against, but eventually caved.

I like a happy ending!